Evaluation of the endosymbiosis theory

It was agreed that the mitochondrion, the powerhouse of the eukaryote cell, evolved from an engulfed bacterium.

Its progress, however, is less often a commanding stride than a kind of halting stagger — more like the path of the wandering minstrel than the straight-ruled trajectory of a military marching band. The development of science is influenced by intellectual fashions, is frequently dependent upon the growth of technology, Evaluation of the endosymbiosis theory in any case, seldom can be planned far in advance, since its destination is usually unknown.

Cameron Neylon A simplified depiction of the cyclic nature of scientific research: An initial observation triggers an idea that is being developed into a hypothesis which — if funds, equipment and the necessary expertise are available — may lead to experimental data or other forms of verifiable evidence that can support or contradict the hypothesis or other existing theoretical descriptions of the system at hand, which in turn can trigger independent replication or falsification of this particular experiment if the relevant information are made available to other researchers.

Traditionally, this publication step would be achieved solely via articles in toll-access scientific journals but initiatives like Open AccessOpen Source and Open Data are increasingly making all these individual steps public, which is facilitated through the use of Web 2.

Generally accepted components of a scientific method are: Moreover, according to most current views, observations do not come into view wholly independently of some predetermined or preconceived theory; scientists struggle to keep their preconceptions and presuppositions out of the picture.

Hypotheses are general statements, formulated as plausible conjectures to explain existing observations and predict future observations. Not all areas of science involve direct experimentation; as an example for data-driven researchthe Human Genome Project largely involved highly technical interpretation of gene sequences, but the data were obtained by experimental investigation.

A theory incorporates a set of supported hypotheses into a logical framework that overall explains the phenomenon studied.

Not all of the statements of a theory are necessarily open to experimental testing, but many are expected to be for a theory to be considered scientific.

Evaluation of the endosymbiosis theory

The scientific method usually involves further testing of its accepted satisfactory overall explanation of a phenomenon, as natural phenomena usually have more observable features than the theorist knows at the time the theory hatches. A good theory will make accurate predictions about the behavioral aspects of the phenomenon studied, suggesting experiments to test its overall explanatory power.

A prediction is a logical deduction from a hypothesis or theory by which the hypothesis or theory can be tested experimentally. A 'test' of a hypothesis is an experiment, the results of which might falsify disprove the hypothesis; if the test does not falsify the hypothesis, the test is said to support 'confirm' the hypothesis.

The same holds for testing theories. Satisfactory explanations are often regarded as those that establish a cause-effect relationship. However, many scientists argue that concepts of causality are not obligatory to science, but are well-defined only under particular conditions.

Progress in extending existing theoretical frameworks is made possible by a scientific culture that encourages challenges to existing theory, while also demanding that far-reaching conjectures are validated by exceptional evidence. Most scientists receive no tuition in scientific method, but those who have been instructed perform no better as scientists than those who have not.

Of what other branch of learning can it be said that it gives its proficients no advantage; that it need not be taught or, if taught, need not be learned? Peter Medawar [13] Evolutionary processes and, in general, scientific explanations of the world are often in contrast with the immediate and simple explanations that our brain gives of reality e.

Indeed, this is an important part of science, and technological advances in our ability to interrogate the world have played an essential part in the advance of science: However, observations, things that we might sometimes call 'facts', are just the beginning. Thus, according to Charles Darwin"science consists in grouping facts so that general laws or conclusions may be drawn from them.

How much can we trust our senses to allow us to believe what we see? How do they choose which facts to attend to, and is it possible to do this in an objective way? And having done this, how do they draw any broader conclusions? Most importantly, how can we ever know more than we observe directly?

We live in a world that is not directly understandable: Our explanations identify some things as important and other things as irrelevant; they lead us to pay attention to some things and not others, and they lead us to expect some things to happen and not others — they lead, in other words, to predictions.

Nothing about this is unique to science, but scientists attempt to harness these universal elements of reasoning in a consistent, systematic and rigorous manner, and in a way that minimizes bias. What we call the 'scientific method' is an account of how scientists gather and report observations in ways that will be understood by other scientists and accepted as valid evidence, and how they construct explanations that are consistent with the world, and that can withstand logical and experimental scrutiny and provide the foundations for further increases in understanding.

The English philosopher Francis Baconoften described as the pioneer of the modern scientific method, proposed that scientists should "empty their minds" of self-evident truths and, by observation and experimentation, should draw general conclusions by a process known as induction.

No excellence of wit, no repetition of chance experiments, can overcome such difficulties as these.Evaluation of Social Learning Theory Essay Evaluation of Social learning theory In this essay, I will try to evaluate Social learning theory as originated by Albert Bandura. I am going to use three pieces of evidence, in a form of case studies, which have been done .

Darwin's Theory of Evolution - James Hutton was born June 3rd, , in Edinburgh, Scotland. He was a Scottish farmer and a naturalist, later in life he was known as the father of modern geology.

Research papers on univalent functions theory describe a place essay, culminating order essays essay on ups and downs in school life, seattle times boeing research paper.

Nichd study evaluation essay literary essay anchor essay about life expectancy bathing suits throughout history essay commentary research papers endosymbiosis theory essay einband turingmaschine beispiel essay essay about my city.

Apply the endosymbiosis theory to eukaryotic cell structure.

Evaluation of the endosymbiosis theory

Describe three benefits of compartmentalization found in cells. Examine why organelles increase cell efficiency and function. Infer how the proportion of organelles might differ between a muscle cell and a nerve cell.

Symbiosis is a close relationship between two or more different species. There are three types of symbiosis we will discover: Commensalism— A relationship where one species obtains food or shelter from the other species.

Quote Mine Project: Assorted Quotes