References and Further Reading 1. The Non-Empirical Nature of the Ontological Arguments It is worth reflecting for a moment on what a remarkable and beautiful!
Philosophers call such arguments a priori arguments. There clearly are certain claims that we can tell are false without even having to look into them to find out. The claim to have made a four-sided triangle, and the claim to be over six feet tall but less than five, for example, are both claims that are obviously false.
We know that triangles have three sides. We know that being over six feet tall means being over five feet tall too. No one that understands what the words in these claims mean would think that they might be true.
The claim that God does not exist is self-contradictory. This is the key idea behind the ontological argument.
This means that if a thing is perfect then it is impossible to imagine it being better than it is; there is nothing better than it is to imagine.
If we think of God as being perfect—and perfection, remember, is part of the concept of God—then we must therefore think of God as a being that cannot be imagined to be better than he is. What the Ontological Argument Proves Whether this argument is successful is controversial.
There are a number of objections to the ontological argumentwhich many, though not all, accept as decisive. This would establish a lot of what the monotheistic religions say about God to be true—if God is perfect then he is also omniscient, omnipotent, eternal, etc.
It would show that there exists a God that is perfect in every way, but it would not demonstrate much about the relationship between that God and us. The remaining arguments, in contrast, if they are successful, tell us less about what God is like but more about how he relates to us.
The first of them is the first cause argumentwhich seeks to establish the existence of a Creator.The First Cause Argument.
The second purported proof of the existence of God is the first cause argument, also called “the cosmological argument”.The first cause argument seeks to prove the existence of God from the fact that the universe exists. I’m excited to start my series today on “65 Questions Every Christian Parent Needs to Learn to Answer.”Yes, I’m going to answer each one on my blog this year (amongst other posts)!
Let’s get right to question #1: What key arguments are there for God’s existence?
If you can’t confidently answer that question right now in a way that doesn’t reference your personal experience or. An ontological argument is a philosophical argument for the existence of God that uses srmvision.com arguments fall under the category of the ontological, and they tend to involve arguments about the state of being or existing.
More specifically, ontological arguments tend to start with an a priori theory about the organization of the universe.
If that organizational structure is true, the. Previous Index Next Aquinas’ Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God St. Thomas Aquinas () was a Dominican priest, theologian, and philosopher.
Question: "What is the Ontological argument for the existence of God?" Answer: The ontological argument is an argument based not on observation of the world (like the cosmological and teleological arguments) but rather on reason alone.
Specifically, the ontological argument reasons from the study of being (ontology). They have also believed that an effective rational argument for God's existence is an important first step in opening the mind to the possibility of faith—in clearing some of the roadblocks and rubble that prevent people from taking the idea of divine revelation seriously.